Taso — “the language of what is not there”

435 words. Part of the Conlangs as Tools project, edition v1.2 (2026-09-27).
Brief drafted by Doruga (Pete’s mobile-companion agent), edited by Peter Kaminski, 2026-05-28.
♡ Copying is an act of love. Please copy and share.
© Peter Kaminski · CC-BY 4.0 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International)


Taso brief · Taso deep dive → · project home · all files (.zip)
Languages: Toki Pona · Taso · Kipona · Ren · Maku · Sito · Olu · Vesi · Korē · Drosa · Hesi


What it explores

Toki Pona names what is present. Its lexicon points at things, qualities, relations in the world. Taso inverts the lens: it names what is absent, missing, withheld, forgotten, not-yet, no-longer. The lesson it builds on: if vocabulary shapes attention, a vocabulary of presence trains a habit of presence — and a vocabulary of absence might train a habit of attending to negative space.

Profile

Taso has ~50 core roots, each one a kind of absence. English collapses these into a single word (“missing,” “gone”); Taso refuses to. The grammar runs in the reverse direction of most languages — you cannot easily assert presence directly; presence is the negation of an absence (“not-still-coming” → “here already”). Speakers report attending to chairs that are empty, meetings that didn’t happen, people who didn’t come, drafts that were not written.

The philosophical kin is figure/ground inversion in Gestalt, and the phenomenology of grief and waiting.

Examples

Core roots:

Sentences:

Future action research

  1. Phenomenological interviews. Recruit speakers who have used Taso for six months. Do they report different attention patterns to environment? Use diary studies; compare with control group.
  2. Grief and waiting. Pair Taso with bereavement counseling. Does an explicit lexicon of absence help mourners articulate their experience? (Ethics review essential.)
  3. Negative-space design. Architects and product designers asked to evaluate spaces in Taso. Do they catch different things than peers evaluating in English?
  4. LLM negative prompting. Train or fine-tune an LLM on Taso. Hypothesis: it becomes better at “what’s missing from this draft” critique than models trained on positive description.
  5. Cross-linguistic comparison. Russian otsutstvuet, Japanese 不在 (fuzai), and Welsh hiraeth all carve absence differently. Map Taso’s 50 onto these systems — what does each natural language miss?

Continue to the Taso deep dive →