Ren — “things are slowed-down verbs”

422 words. Part of the Conlangs as Tools project, edition v1.2 (2026-09-27).
Brief drafted by Doruga (Pete’s mobile-companion agent), edited by Peter Kaminski, 2026-05-28.
♡ Copying is an act of love. Please copy and share.
© Peter Kaminski · CC-BY 4.0 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International)


Ren brief · Ren deep dive → · project home · all files (.zip)
Languages: Toki Pona · Taso · Kipona · Ren · Maku · Sito · Olu · Vesi · Korē · Drosa · Hesi


What it explores

Toki Pona lets parts of speech flex — the same word can be noun, verb, modifier. Ren takes the next step: it removes the noun category entirely. Everything in Ren is a verb, a relation, or a process. A “stone” is “the long-settled.” A “river” is “the keeps-flowing.” A “person” is “the deciding-walking.”

The lesson Ren tests: process philosophy (Whitehead), Buddhist anatman, and some strains of cognitive science argue that the noun-bias of Indo-European languages produces a corresponding object-bias in metaphysics. What happens if a language refuses the bias?

Profile

Ren has ~200 verbal roots — none of them name an object. Nominal expressions are built by adding participle markers that “freeze” a verb into a referent. kal- (to settle) → kal-i (the settled-thing). But the participle never fully escapes the verb beneath it; the metaphysics of Ren is one of continuously slowed processes.

Identity itself is grammatical: “I” is jen-i, “the-currently-deciding- walking.” Past selves are jen-iko (“the-once-deciding-walking-now-stilled”).

Ren is hard to learn. The hard part is unlearning the impulse to reach for a noun.

Examples

Sentence:

The verb-first grain of every utterance pushes the speaker toward dynamics and away from static description.

Future action research

  1. Cognitive framing. Standard psychology tasks (e.g., the essentialism-bias studies in developmental psych) rerun with Ren speakers. Do they show reduced essentialism about social categories?
  2. Self-concept. Interview Ren-speakers about identity. Do they describe themselves more episodically (a string of decisions-and-walks) than essentially (a noun, a kind)?
  3. Buddhist & process-philosophy collaboration. Use Ren as a research medium for traditions that hold no-self / process-primary metaphysics. Does the language help articulate what English struggles to?
  4. Machine learning. Train an LLM on Ren-shaped data. Does its internal representation of objects shift toward dynamic, time-indexed embeddings? (Compare frozen and unfrozen states.)
  5. Object permanence reframing. A small experiment with bilingual children (Ren-English) on classic Piaget tasks. The hypothesis is gentle and falsifiable — but worth testing.

Continue to the Ren deep dive →